Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
| Type | Journal Article |
| Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
| Title | Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective |
| Organization Unit | |
| Authors |
|
| Item Subtype | Original Work |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Status | Published in final form |
| Language |
|
| Journal Title | Journal of Applied Behavioral Science |
| Publisher | Sage Publications |
| Geographical Reach | international |
| ISSN | 0021-8863 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Number | 1 |
| Page Range | 98 - 120 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Abstract Text | It has often been argued by scholars adopting a practice approach that by focusing on “what people do in relation to strategy” their research would be particularly relevant to practitioners. In response to this assumption, this article draws on a Bourdieusian perspective to argue that most practice-based strategy scholars are unaware of their inevitably “scholastic view” which is the cause for the gap between strategy research and praxis. This unawareness leads to two related fallacies: epistemic doxa and scholastic ethnocentrism. In order to avoid these fallacies, strategy researchers need to develop a particular kind of reflexivity by engaging in what is known as “participant objectivation.” This enables the researcher to generate rigorous research that is conceptually relevant to practitioners—without dissolving the necessary differentiation between strategy research and praxis. |
| Digital Object Identifier | 10.1177/0021886310396322 |
| Other Identification Number | merlin-id:4542 |
| Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA)
|