Not logged in.

Contribution Details

Type Journal Article
Scope Discipline-based scholarship
Title Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021)
Organization Unit
Authors
  • Bart Meuleman
  • Tomasz Żółtak
  • Artur Pokropek
  • Eldad Davidov
  • Bengt Muthén
  • Daniel L Oberski
  • Jaak Billiet
  • Peter Schmidt
Item Subtype Original Work
Refereed Yes
Status Published in final form
Language
  • English
Journal Title Sociological Methods & Research
Publisher Sage Publications
Geographical Reach international
ISSN 0049-1241
Volume 52
Number 3
Page Range 1401 - 1419
Date 2023
Abstract Text Welzel et al. (2021) claim that non-invariance of instruments is inconclusive and inconsequential in the field for cross-cultural value measurement. In this response, we contend that several key arguments on which Welzel et al. (2021) base their critique of invariance testing are conceptually and statistically incorrect. First, Welzel et al. (2021) claim that value measurement follows a formative rather than reflective logic. Yet they do not provide sufficient theoretical arguments for this conceptualization, nor do they discuss the disadvantages of this approach for validation of instruments. Second, their claim that strong inter-item correlations cannot be retrieved when means are close to the endpoint of scales ignores the existence of factor-analytic approaches for ordered-categorical indicators. Third, Welzel et al. (2021) propose that rather than of relying on invariance tests, comparability can be assessed by studying the connection with theoretically related constructs. However, their proposal ignores that external validation through nomological linkages hinges on the assumption of comparability. By means of two examples, we illustrate that violating the assumptions of measurement invariance can distort conclusions substantially. Following the advice of Welzel et al. (2021) implies discarding a tool that has proven to be very useful for comparativists.
Digital Object Identifier 10.1177/00491241221091755
Other Identification Number merlin-id:23451
PDF File Download from ZORA
Export BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA)
Keywords Sociology and Political Science, Social Sciences (miscellaneous) Measurement invariance, cross-cultural research, reflective vs. formative measurement, ordered-categorical data analysis, nomological linkages