Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
Type | Conference or Workshop Paper |
Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
Published in Proceedings | Yes |
Title | Do Explicit Review Strategies Improve Code Review Performance? |
Organization Unit | |
Authors |
|
Presentation Type | paper |
Item Subtype | Original Work |
Refereed | Yes |
Status | Published in final form |
Language |
|
ISBN | 9781450375177 |
Page Range | 606 - 610 |
Event Title | MSR '20: 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories |
Event Type | conference |
Event Location | Seoul Republic of Korea |
Event Start Date | July 29 - 2020 |
Event End Date | July 30 - 2020 |
Place of Publication | New York, NY, USA |
Publisher | ACM |
Abstract Text | Context: Code review is a fundamental, yet expensive part of software engineering. Therefore, research on understanding code review and its efficiency and performance is paramount. Objective: We aim to test the effect of a guidance approach on review effectiveness and efficiency. This effect is expected to work by lowering the cognitive load of the task; thus, we analyze the mediation relationship as well. Method: To investigate this effect, we employ an experimental design where professional developers have to perform three code reviews. We use three conditions: no guidance, a checklist, and a checklist-based review strategy. Furthermore, we measure the reviewers' cognitive load. Limitations: The main limitations of this study concern the specific cohort of participants, the mono-operation bias for the guidance conditions, and the generalizability to other changes and defects. Full registered report: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5FPTJ; Materials: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11806656 |
Free access at | DOI |
Digital Object Identifier | 10.1145/3379597.3387509 |
Other Identification Number | merlin-id:21597 |
PDF File | Download from ZORA |
Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA) |
Funders | SNF project No. PP00P2_170529 |