Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
Type | Conference or Workshop Paper |
Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
Published in Proceedings | Yes |
Title | Balancing continuity and novelty: The practical relevance of management research from the practitioners' perspective |
Organization Unit | |
Authors |
|
Presentation Type | paper |
Item Subtype | Original Work |
Refereed | No |
Status | Published in final form |
Language |
|
Event Title | TOPOS Seminar |
Event Type | workshop |
Event Location | University of Oxford |
Event Start Date | February 27 - 2018 |
Event End Date | February 27 - 2018 |
Abstract Text | In management research, the literature on practical relevance holds that practitioners actively construct practical relevance. However, the practitioners' perspective on relevance has received very little scholarly attention to date. This paper puts forward a theoretical model for examining how practitioners construct academic knowledge as practically relevant based on interviews with practitioners enrolled on executive MBA (EMBA) courses. The model shows that practitioners construct academic knowledge as relevant by (1) perceiving it as congruent with their context, experiences and intuition, (2) extending their knowledge by new instruments, constructs, and means of scientific framing and (3) reconnecting it to their contexts and professional practices. This model extends the literature by showing that, in order to be considered practically relevant, academic knowledge needs to balance novelty and continuity. Additionally, the paper shows that practitioners are unlikely to perceive as relevant ambiguous academic knowledge that is 'action expansive', i.e. that presents them with an overwhelming range of possible actions. |
Free access at | DOI |
Official URL | https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/v4su8/ |
Digital Object Identifier | 10.31235/osf.io/v4su8 |
Other Identification Number | merlin-id:17337 |
PDF File | Download from ZORA |
Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA) |