Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
Type | Conference or Workshop Paper |
Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
Published in Proceedings | Yes |
Title | Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process |
Organization Unit | |
Authors |
|
Editors |
|
Presentation Type | paper |
Item Subtype | Original Work |
Refereed | Yes |
Status | Published in final form |
Language |
|
ISBN | 978-1-60558-001-2 |
Page Range | 91 - 100 |
Event Title | 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering |
Event Type | conference |
Event Location | Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
Event Start Date | August 24 - 2009 |
Event End Date | August 28 - 2009 |
Place of Publication | New York, NY, USA |
Publisher | ACM |
Abstract Text | Prediction of software defects works well within projects as long as there is a sufficient amount of data available to train any models. However, this is rarely the case for new software projects and for many companies. So far, only a few have studies focused on transferring prediction models from one project to another. In this paper, we study cross-project defect prediction models on a large scale. For 12 real-world applications, we ran 622 cross-project predictions. Our results indicate that cross-project prediction is a serious challenge, i.e., simply using models from projects in the same domain or with the same process does not lead to accurate predictions. To help software engineers choose models wisely, we identified factors that do influence the success of cross-project predictions. We also derived decision trees that can provide early estimates for precision, recall, and accuracy before a prediction is attempted. |
Related URLs | |
Digital Object Identifier | 10.1145/1595696.1595713 |
Other Identification Number | merlin-id:165 |
PDF File | Download from ZORA |
Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA) |