Not logged in.

Contributions published at Human Resource Management and Leadership (Jochen Menges)

Contribution
Heike Bruch, Jochen Menges, Boesche A., Wie erfolgreiche Unternehmen mit Energie Kunden begeistern , In: Jahrbuch Kunde im Fokus, IM Marketing-Forum , Ettlingen, p. 72 - 75, 2007. (Book Chapter) null
Heike Bruch, Jochen Menges, Die besten Arbeitgeber im deutschen Mittelstand, In: Top Job 2007, Frankfurt, Redline Wirtschaft, p. 6 - 27, 2007. (Book Chapter) null
Heike Bruch, Jochen Menges, Strategisches Personalmanagement: Analyse und praktische Hinweise für Planung, Aufbau und Weiterentwicklung von Personalarbeit in KMU, In: Planung in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen, Eul, Lohmar, p. 243 - 261, 2007. (Book Chapter) null
Markus Menz, Lydia Ebersbach, Jochen Menges, Mergers & acquisitions: von der Strategie zur Integration: Tagungsband zum 5. DocNet-Management-Symposium, Haupt, Bern, 2007. (Book/Research Monograph)
Heike Bruch, Jochen Menges, Stärke im Personalmanagement zahlt sich aus : HR-Management im Mittelstand , Personalwirtschaft, Vol. 34 (3), 2007. (Journal Article) null
Heike Bruch, Jochen Menges, Strategische Personalarbeit zahlt sich aus, Unternehmer Edition (1), 2007. (Journal Article) null
Heike Bruch, Jochen Menges, Stärken im Personalmanagement zahlt sich aus, Personalwirtschaft, Vol. 34 (3), 2007. (Journal Article) null
H. Bruch, Jochen Menges, Mit Strategie zu mehr Attraktivität, Personalwirtschaft, Vol. 33 (8), 2006. (Journal Article) null
Klaus Fiedler, Wolfram Schenck, Marlin Watling, Jochen Menges, Priming trait inferences through pictures and moving pictures: the impact of open and closed mindsets, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 88 (2), 2005. (Journal Article) A newly developed paradigm for studying spontaneous trait inferences (STI) was applied in 3 experiments. The authors primed dyadic stimulus behaviors involving a subject (S) and an object (O) person through degraded pictures or movies. An encoding task called for the verification of either a graphical feature or a semantic interpretation, which either fit or did not fit the primed behavior. Next, participants had to identify a trait word that appeared gradually behind a mask and that either matched or did not match the primed behavior. STI effects, defined as shorter identification latencies for matching than nonmatching traits, were stronger for S than for O traits, after graphical rather than semantic encoding decisions and after encoding failures. These findings can be explained by assuming that trait inferences are facilitated by open versus closed mindsets supposed to result from distracting (graphical) encoding tasks or encoding failures (involving nonfitting interpretations).

Previous 1 2 3 45