Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
| Type | Journal Article |
| Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
| Title | The as-is journal review process: let authors own their ideas |
| Organization Unit | |
| Authors |
|
| Item Subtype | Original Work |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Status | Published in final form |
| Language |
|
| Journal Title | Academy of Management Learning and Education (AMLE) |
| Publisher | Academy of Management |
| Geographical Reach | international |
| ISSN | 1537-260X |
| Volume | 6 |
| Number | 1 |
| Page Range | 128 - 136 |
| Date | 2007 |
| Abstract Text | Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: a manuscript should be reviewed on an "as is" basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own all of the ideas in their publications. |
| Official URL | http://aom.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&issn=1537-260X&volume=6&issue=1&spage=128 |
| Related URLs | |
| Digital Object Identifier | 10.5465/AMLE.2007.24401710 |
| PDF File |
Download from ZORA
|
| Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA)
|