Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
Type | Working Paper |
Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
Title | Does competition justify inequality? |
Organization Unit | |
Authors |
|
Language |
|
Institution | University of Zurich |
Series Name | Working paper series / Department of Economics |
Number | 158 |
ISSN | 1664-7041 |
Number of Pages | 57 |
Date | 2015 |
Abstract Text | Are competitive mechanisms perceived as just sources of economic inequality? Perceptions of fairness violations can have severe economic consequences, as they may cause counterproductive behavior such as rulebook slowdowns or quality shading. To analyze fairness perceptions associated with competitive mechanisms, we run laboratory experiments where a single powerful buyer can trade with one of several sellers—an environment that can lead to pronounced inequality among the interacting parties. Once the terms of trade are determined, sellers can engage in counterproductive behavior. We robustly find that low procurement prices, which allocate most of the surplus from trade to the buyer, trigger significantly less counterproductive behavior if the buyer uses a competitive auction to determine the terms of trade than if he uses his price setting power to dictate the same terms directly. Our data demonstrate that competitive mechanisms, in addition to their capability to produce efficient allocations, can reduce conflict and inefficient reactions by increasing justification for economic inequality. |
Free access at | Official URL |
Official URL | http://www.econ.uzh.ch/static/wp/econwp158.pdf |
Related URLs | |
PDF File | Download from ZORA |
Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA) |
Keywords | Fairness, competition, markets, efficiency, inequality, Fairness, Ungleichheit, Prozedurale Gerechtigkeitstheorie, Wettbewerb |
Additional Information | Revised version ; former title: "Let the market decide: an experimental study of competition and fairness" |