Not logged in.

Contribution Details

Type Conference or Workshop Paper
Scope Discipline-based scholarship
Published in Proceedings Yes
Title When testing meets code review: why and how developers review tests
Organization Unit
Authors
  • Davide Spadini
  • Maurício Aniche
  • Margaret-Anne Storey
  • Magiel Bruntink
  • Alberto Bacchelli
Presentation Type paper
Item Subtype Original Work
Refereed Yes
Status Published in final form
Language
  • English
ISBN 9781450356381
Page Range 677 - 687
Event Title 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)
Event Type conference
Event Location Gothenburg, Sweden
Event Start Date June 27 - 2018
Event End Date July 3 - 2018
Series Name Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering
Place of Publication New York, New York, USA
Publisher Association for Computing Machinery
Abstract Text Automated testing is considered an essential process for ensuring software quality. However, writing and maintaining high-quality test code is challenging and frequently considered of secondary importance. For production code, many open source and industrial software projects employ code review, a well-established software quality practice, but the question remains whether and how code review is also used for ensuring the quality of test code. The aim of this research is to answer this question and to increase our understanding of what developers think and do when it comes to reviewing test code. We conducted both quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze more than 300,000 code reviews, and interviewed 12 developers about how they review test files. This work resulted in an overview of current code reviewing practices, a set of identified obstacles limiting the review of test code, and a set of issues that developers would like to see improved in code review tools. The study reveals that reviewing test files is very different from reviewing production files, and that the navigation within the review itself is one of the main issues developers currently face. Based on our findings, we propose a series of recommendations and suggestions for the design of tools and future research.
Related URLs
Digital Object Identifier 10.1145/3180155.3180192
Other Identification Number merlin-id:16641
PDF File Download from ZORA
Export BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA)