Contributions published at Dynamic and Distributed Information Systems (Abraham Bernstein)

null

null

null

Background: Value sensitivity – the ability to recognize value-related issues when they arise in practice – is an indispensable competence for medical practitioners to enter decision-making processes related to ethical questions. However, the psychological competence of value sensitivity is seldom an explicit subject in the training of medical professionals. In this contribution, we outline the traditional concept of moral sensitivity in medicine and its revised form conceptualized as value sensitivity and we propose an instrument that measures value sensitivity. Methods: We developed an instrument for assessing the sensitivity for three value groups (moral-related values, values related to the principles of biomedical ethics, strategy-related values) in a four step procedure: 1) value identification (n = 317); 2) value representation (n = 317); 3) vignette construction and quality evaluation (n = 37); and 4) instrument validation by comparing nursing professionals with hospital managers (n = 48). Results: We find that nursing professionals recognize and ascribe importance to principle-related issues more than professionals from hospital management. The latter are more likely to recognize and ascribe importance to strategy-related issues. Conclusions: These hypothesis-driven results demonstrate the discriminatory power of our newly developed instrument, which makes it useful not only for health care professionals in practice but for students and people working in the clinical context as well.

In the last two decades, we have experienced a tremendous growth of the digital infrastructure, leading to an emerging web ecosystem that involves a variety of new types of services. A characteristic element of this web ecosystem is the massive increase of the amount, availability and interpretability of digitalized information—a development for which the buzzword “big data” has been coined. For research, this offers opportunities that just 20 years ago were believed to be impossible. Researchers now can access large participant pools directly using services like Amazon Mechanical Turk, they can collaborate with companies like Facebook to analyze their massive data sets, they can create own research infrastructures by, e.g., providing data-collecting Apps for smartphones, or they can enter new types of collaborations with citizens that donate personal data. Traditional research ethics with its focus of informed consent is challenged by such developments: How can informed consent be given when big data research seeks for unknown patterns? How can people control their data? How can unintended effects (e.g., discrimination) be prevented when a person donates personal data? In this contribution, we will discuss the ethical justification for big data research and we will argue that a focus on informed consent is insufficient for providing its moral basis. We propose that the ethical issues cluster along three core values—autonomy, fairness and responsibility—that need to be addressed. Finally, we outline how a possible research infrastructure could look like that would allow for ethical big data research.

Researchers, governments, and funding agencies are calling on research disciplines to embrace open data - data that is publicly accessible and usable beyond the original authors. The premise is that research efforts can draw and generate several benefits from open data, as such data might provide further insight, enabling the replication and extension of current knowledge in different contexts. These potential benefits, coupled with a global push towards open data policies, brings open data into the agenda of research disciplines – including Information Systems (IS). This paper responds to these developments as follows. We outline themes in the ongoing discussion around open data in the IS discipline. The themes fall into two clusters: (1) The motivation for open data includes themes of mandated sharing, benefits to the research process, extending the life of research data, and career impact; (2) The implementation of open data includes themes of governance, socio-technical system, standards, data quality, and ethical considerations. In this paper, we outline the findings from a pre-ICIS 2016 workshop on the topic of open data. The workshop discussion confirmed themes and identified issues that require attention in terms of the approaches that are currently utilized by IS researchers. The IS discipline offers a unique knowledge base, tools, and methods that can advance open data across disciplines. Based on our findings, we provide suggestions on how IS researchers can drive the open data conversation. Further, we provide advice for the adoption and establishment of procedures and guidelines for the archival, evaluation, and use of open data.

null

This paper describes the foundations of smart business process management and serves as an editorial to the corresponding special issue. To this end, we introduce a framework that distinguishes three levels of business process management: multi process management, process model management, and process instance management. For each of these levels we identify major contributions of prior research and describe in how far papers assembled in this special issue extend our understanding of smart business process man- agement.

This paper describes the foundations of smart business process management and serves as an editorial to the corresponding special issue. To this end, we introduce a framework that distinguishes three levels of business process management: multi process management, process model management, and process instance management. For each of these levels we identify major contributions of prior research and describe in how far papers assembled in this special issue extend our understanding of smart business process man- agement.

null

This paper presents five studies on the development and validation of a scale of intellectual humility. This scale captures cognitive, affective, behavioral, and motivational components of the construct that have been identified by various philosophers in their conceptual analyses of intellectual humility. We find that intellectual humility has four core dimensions: Open-mindedness (versus Arrogance), Intellectual Modesty (versus Vanity), Corrigibility (versus Fragility), and Engagement (versus Boredom). These dimensions display adequate self-informant agreement, and adequate convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity. In particular, Open-mindedness adds predictive power beyond the Big Six for an objective behavioral measure of intellectual humility, and Intellectual Modesty is uniquely related to Narcissism. We find that a similar factor structure emerges in Germanophone participants, giving initial evidence for the model’s cross-cultural generalizability.

Recommender systems form the backbone of many interactive systems. They incorporate user feedback to personalize the user experience typically via personalized recommendation lists. As users interact with a system, an increasing amount of data about a user’s preferences becomes available, which can be leveraged for improving the systems’ performance. Incorporating these new data into the underlying recommendation model is, however, not always straightforward. Many models used by recommender systems are computationally expensive and, therefore, have to perform offline computations to compile the recommendation lists. For interactive applications, it is desirable to be able to update the computed values as soon as new user interaction data is available: updating recommendations in interactive time using new feedback data leads to better accuracy and increases the attraction of the system to the users. Additionally, there is a growing consensus that accuracy alone is not enough and user satisfaction is also dependent on diverse recommendations. In this work, we tackle this problem of updating personalized recommendation lists for interactive applications in order to provide both accurate and diverse recommendations. To that end, we explore algorithms that exploit random walks as a sampling technique to obtain diverse recommendations without compromising on efficiency and accuracy. Specifically, we present a novel graph vertex ranking recommendation algorithm called RP3β that reranks items based on three-hop random walk transition probabilities. We show empirically that RP3β provides accurate recommendations with high long-tail item frequency at the top of the recommendation list. We also present approximate versions of RP3β and the two most accurate previously published vertex ranking algorithms based on random walk transition probabilities and show that these approximations converge with an increasing number of samples. To obtain interactively updatable recommendations, we additionally show how our algorithm can be extended for online updates at interactive speeds. The underlying random walk sampling technique makes it possible to perform the updates without having to recompute the values for the entire dataset. In an empirical evaluation with three real-world datasets, we show that RP3β provides highly accurate and diverse recommendations that can easily be updated with newly gathered information at interactive speeds (≪ 100ms).

A critical bottleneck in crowdsourced innovation challenges is the process of reviewing and selecting the best submissions. This bottleneck is especially problematic in settings where submissions are complex intellectual artifacts whose evaluation requires expertise. To help reduce the review load from experts, we offer a computational approach that relies on analyzing sociolinguistic and other characteristics of submission text, as well as activities of the crowd and the submission authors, and scores the submissions. We developed and tested models based on data from contests done in a large citizen-science platform - the Climate CoLab - and find that they are able to accurately predict expert decisions about the submissions, and can lead to substantial reduction of review labor, and acceleration of the review process.

The majority illusion that was discovered by Lerman et al. tricks individuals into perceiving a social behavior to be popular when in reality, it is not. That is, vertices in a network overestimate the presence of an attribute as highly connected vertices skew the perception of their neighbors. We show how the majority illusion can be quantified on a vertex-centric and a global perspective for binary as well as for continuous attributes. In the context of social contagion, the majority illusion is an interesting case of disproportionate experiences that can cause a false truth to propagate through a network. We propose an approach to exploit the majority illusion in order to artificially promote the diffusion of a binary attribute in a network in a threshold model Granovetter (1978). Our approach returns target vertex sets that are guaranteed to cause an influence cascade that eventually activates the entire network. Our approach out-performs a naive highest-degree approach in scale-free networks that exhibit network structures as described by Barabàsi et al. (2000) and Dorogovtsev and Mendes (2002). In small-word networks as described by Watts and Strogatz (1998) our approach returns target vertex sets that, on average, have twice the size of target vertex sets retrieved with a highest-degree approach. Additionally, we introduce an alternative dynamic diffusion model that considers the time dimension and incorporates assumptions we make about human behavior in the real world. In the diffusion model we introduce, we were unable to confirm or to disprove that the extent and speed at which a social behavior propagates in a diffusion process profits from highly clustered network structures as suggested by Centola (2010) and Centola and Baronchelli (2015).