Not logged in.
Quick Search - Contribution
Contribution Details
Type | Journal Article |
Scope | Discipline-based scholarship |
Title | Dissociating neural learning signals in human sign- and goal-trackers |
Organization Unit | |
Authors |
|
Item Subtype | Original Work |
Refereed | Yes |
Status | Published in final form |
Language |
|
Journal Title | Nature Human Behaviour |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
Geographical Reach | international |
ISSN | 2397-3374 |
Volume | 4 |
Number | 2 |
Page Range | 201 - 214 |
Date | 2020 |
Abstract Text | Individuals differ in how they learn from experience. In Pavlovian conditioning models, where cues predict reinforcer delivery at a different goal location, some animals—called sign-trackers—come to approach the cue, whereas others, called goal-trackers, approach the goal. In sign-trackers, model-free phasic dopaminergic reward-prediction errors underlie learning, which renders stimuli ‘wanted’. Goal-trackers do not rely on dopamine for learning and are thought to use model-based learning. We demonstrate this double dissociation in 129 male humans using eye-tracking, pupillometry and functional magnetic resonance imaging informed by computational models of sign- and goal-tracking. We show that sign-trackers exhibit a neural reward prediction error signal that is not detectable in goal-trackers. Model-free value only guides gaze and pupil dilation in sign-trackers. Goal-trackers instead exhibit a stronger model-based neural state prediction error signal. This model-based construct determines gaze and pupil dilation more in goal-trackers. |
Digital Object Identifier | 10.1038/s41562-019-0765-5 |
Other Identification Number | merlin-id:18813 |
PDF File | Download from ZORA |
Export |
BibTeX
EP3 XML (ZORA) |
Keywords | Classical conditioning, human behaviour, learning algorithms, reward |